LINE

Text:AAAPrint
Politics

Decision makes Middle East peace a more remote prospect

1
2017-12-08 10:00China Daily Editor: Wang Zihao ECNS App Download
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers a speech at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem on May 23, 2017. In the final remarks that concluded his first visit to the region, U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday that peace between Israel and the Palestinians is possible. (Photo/Xinhua)

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers a speech at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem on May 23, 2017. In the final remarks that concluded his first visit to the region, U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday that peace between Israel and the Palestinians is "possible". (Photo/Xinhua)

By recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel on Wednesday and ordering preparations for moving the U.S. embassy there, U.S. President Donald Trump defied the will of the majority of countries, and not for the first time.

On June 1, he declared that the United States would withdraw from the Paris climate agreement to which the U.S. was one of the 195 signatories.

In announcing his explosive decision on Wednesday, Trump claimed it to be in the best interests of the U.S. and the pursuit of peace between Israel and the Palestinians. "This is a long-overdue step to advance the peace process and to work towards a lasting agreement," he said.

But nothing could be further from the truth. He has taken a giant step toward further destabilizing the volatile Middle East.

Shortly after his speech, protests erupted in Gaza City, Istanbul and Amman. More protests are expected in the days ahead.

The U.S. likes to boast it has the most allies in the world, but Trump found none siding with him on this decision, not even close West European allies such as Britain, France and Germany, all of which warned him beforehand not to go ahead with it and slammed his decision afterwards.

As UN Security Council Resolution 194 states "the only way to peace is by establishing an independent Palestinian State, with East Jerusalem as its capital, living in peace next to Israel".

"I want to make it clear-there is no alternative to the two-state solution. There is no Plan B," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said.

It is reported that some key cabinet members, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, did not endorse Trump's decision, even though the State Department later said it will immediately begin the process to implement the decision by starting the preparations to move the U.S. embassy from Tel-Aviv to Jerusalem.

Prominent people such as former U.S. ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk, now executive vice-president of the Brookings Institution, and The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, both Jews, criticized Trump's decision.

Trump claimed that he has the public's support, but few people in the U.S. have come out publicly in support of his decision. The 45th U.S. president is said to be merely fulfilling his campaign promise to some American evangelical and Jewish groups.

In doing so, Trump has made it clear that the U.S. is not an honest broker in the peace process as it has long claimed and confirmed the widespread perception that it is biased toward Israel. No wonder that many Muslim and Arab leaders said on Wednesday that they will no longer accept U.S. as the mediator for the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks.

With its clear bias and excessive meddling in the Middle East, the U.S. has long suffered low favorability ratings in the Middle East. A Pew Center report in June this year showed that only 15 percent of people in Jordan and 18 percent in Turkey had at least a somewhat favorable view of the U.S. in 2017.

Past U.S. presidents refrained from doing what Trump did on Wednesday despite a 1995 law requiring the reloation of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, by taking advantage of it also allowing presidents to waive the requirement at six-month intervals to protect U.S. national security interests.

Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all signed the waivers. Trump, too, issued a waiver on June 1 and again on Thursday.

His Wednesday announcement is not just a departure from long-term U.S. foreign policy, but setting off a big bomb and making Middle East peace an even more remote prospect.

The author,Chen Weihua, is deputy editor of China Daily USA.

  

Related news

MorePhoto

Most popular in 24h

MoreTop news

MoreVideo

News
Politics
Business
Society
Culture
Military
Sci-tech
Entertainment
Sports
Odd
Features
Biz
Economy
Travel
Travel News
Travel Types
Events
Food
Hotel
Bar & Club
Architecture
Gallery
Photo
CNS Photo
Video
Video
Learning Chinese
Learn About China
Social Chinese
Business Chinese
Buzz Words
Bilingual
Resources
ECNS Wire
Special Coverage
Infographics
Voices
LINE
Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.