LINE

Text:AAAPrint
Learning Chinese

Hillary Clinton Google suggestions accused of favoring candidate(2)

1
2016-06-13 13:07China Daily Editor: Yao Lan

And in a Friday blog post, Tamar Yehoshua, Google's vice president of product management in charge of the site's search feature, further explained that the autocomplete feature will not offer up derogatory terms in relation to any person.

²¢ÇÒ,¸ºÔð¹È¸èËÑË÷¹¦ÄܵIJúÆ·¹ÜÀí¸±×ܲÃËþÂê¶û•Ò®»ôÊæÑÇÖÜÎå·¢±íÁËһƪ²©¿Í,½øÒ»²½½âÊÍ˵×Ô¶¯²¹È«¹¦Äܲ»»áÌṩÓйØÈκÎÈ˵ıáµÍÐÔ´ÊÓï.

"The autocomplete algorithm is designed to avoid completing a search for a person's name with terms that are offensive or disparaging," Yehoshua wrote. "We made this change a while ago following feedback that Autocomplete too often predicted offensive, hurtful or inappropriate queries about people. This filter operates according to the same rules no matter who the person is."

"ÎÒÃÇÉè¼ÆµÄ×Ô¶¯²¹È«Ëã·¨ÊÇΪÁ˱ÜÃâËÑË÷ÈËÃûµÄʱºòÌî²¹µÄÊÇÓй¥»÷ÐÔ»ò»Ù°ùÐԵĴÊÓï,"Ò®»ôÊæÑÇдµÀ."ÕâÑùµÄ¸Ä±äÊDz»¾ÃÇ°²Å¿ªÊ¼ÊµÐеÄ,ÒòΪÎÒÃǵõ½·´À.¬Ëµ×Ô¶¯²¹È«¹¦ÄÜÔ¤²âµÄ×ÜÊÇÓй¥»÷ÐԵġ¢ÉËÈ˵ĴÊÓï»ò²»Ç¡µ±µÄÖÊÒÉ.²»¹ÜÊÇʲôÈË,ÕâÖÖ¹ýÂ˹¦Äܶ¼ÒÔͬÑùµÄ×¼ÔòÔËÐÐ."

Yehoshua emphasized that autocomplete terminology "isn't an exact science" and the results of the algorithm "changes frequently."

Ò®»ôÊæÑÇÇ¿µ÷³Æ,×Ô¶¯²¹È«´ÊÓï"²»ÊǾ«ÃܵĿÆѧ",¶øÇÒËã·¨µÄ½á¹û"¾­³£»á±ä."

"Predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity and freshness of search terms," he added. "Given that search activity varies, the terms that appears in Autocomplete for you may change over time."

"Ô¤²â»ùÓÚÐí¶àÒòËزúÉú,°üÀ¨ËÑË÷´ÊÌõµÄÈȶȺÍÐÂÏʶÈ,"Ëû²¹³äµÀ."¼øÓÚËÑË÷»î¶¯Ç§²îÍò±ð,¸øÄãµÄ×Ô¶¯Ìî²¹´ÊÓïÒ²Ðí¹ý¶Îʱ¼äÒ²»á¸Ä±ä."

Further, the Google executive noted that while autocomplete predictions are a popular search feature, it does not actively limit the search results.

¶øÇÒ,Õâλ¹È¸è¸±×ܲÃÌáµ½,¾¡¹Ü×Ô¶¯²¹È«Ô¤²âÊǷdz£ÊÜ»¶Ó­µÄËÑË÷¹¦ÄÜ,µ«²¢Ã»ÓÐÖ÷¶¯µØÏÞÖÆËÑË÷½á¹û.

"It's a shortcut for those who are interested," Yehoshua said. "You can still perform whatever search you want to."

"¶Ôϲ»¶ËüµÄÈËÀ´ËµÕâÊÇÒ»Ìõ½Ý¾¶,"Ò®»ôÊæÑÇ˵."ÄãÒÀÈ»¿ÉÒÔËÑË÷ÈκÎÄãÏëËÑË÷µÄÄÚÈÝ."

SourceFed later came out with a follow-up video published Friday to explain the thought process behind their original accusations and defended its results.

Ö®ºó,SourceFedÖÜÎåÓÖ·¢²¼ÁËÒ»¸öºóÐøµÄÊÓƵ,³öÀ´½âÊÍËûÃǵ±³õÖ¸¿Ø±³ºóµÄ˼ά¹ý³Ì,²¢ÎªËûÃÇ·¢ÏֵĽá¹û½øÐÐÁ˱绤.

"We saw something that raised a lot of red flags for us so we spent time doing research -- the results of which were worth sharing," Lieberman, the SourceFed host, said.

"ÎÒÃÇ¿´µ½ÁËһЩÒýÆðÎÒÃÇ×¢ÒâµÄÊÂÇé,ËùÒÔÎÒÃÇ»¨ÁËһЩʱ¼ä×öµ÷²é¡ª¡ªµ÷²é½á¹ûÖµµÃÓë´ó¼Ò·ÖÏí," SourceFedµÄÕÆÃÅÈËÀû²®Âü˵.

 

Ó¢ÎÄÀ´Ô´£ºcbsnews

 

¡¡¡¡

Related news

MorePhoto

Most popular in 24h

MoreTop news

MoreVideo

News
Politics
Business
Society
Culture
Military
Sci-tech
Entertainment
Sports
Odd
Features
Biz
Economy
Travel
Travel News
Travel Types
Events
Food
Hotel
Bar & Club
Architecture
Gallery
Photo
CNS Photo
Video
Video
Learning Chinese
Learn About China
Social Chinese
Business Chinese
Buzz Words
Bilingual
Resources
ECNS Wire
Special Coverage
Infographics
Voices
LINE
Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Copyright ©1999-2018 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.